Showing posts with label Market Performance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Market Performance. Show all posts

Thursday, April 2, 2009

First Quarter 2009 Market Performance

I was quoted in yesturdays Contra Costa Times article on the First Quarter Performance.

Hope you enjoy!

Area stocks outperform market indexes

The stocks of Bay Area and East Bay public companies out-performed their counterparts on the national stock markets during the first quarter — but only by falling less than the Dow Jones 30, S&P 500, and Nasdaq Composite.
By the time the January-March period ended on Tuesday, the East Bay 50 index had fallen 2.7 percent and the Bay Area 100 index was down 0.2 percent. The Dow Jones Industrial Average plunged 13.3 percent, the S&P 500 slid 11.7 percent, and the Nasdaq fell 3.1 percent.
Those three-month losses came despite a general upswing in the stock markets towards the end of the first quarter.
"We seem to have gained some traction in the stock markets in March," said Libby Mihalka, president of Altamont Capital, a Livermore-based financial planning firm. "But we're not out of the woods yet."
The big problem now is financial gremlins continue to haunt broad stretches of the nation's economic landscape. And that has spooked investors.
"Short-term, there are so many things that are unknown," said Royce Charney, president of Oakland-based Trust Administrators, a financial company. "You still have all the bank and financial institution issues, and now we're dealing with the auto industry. But for long-term investors, the market still looks attractive."
Charney defined the long-term
"The collapsing financial system and the problems with the auto companies are hurting consumer psychology the most," said Richard Welty, president of Lafayette-based Welty Capital Management.
Among industry sectors during the quarter, the best-performing national index was the Morgan Stanley Retail Index, which rose 6.3 percent. The weakest sector was the Bloomberg Real Estate Index, which lost 33.7 percent of its value.
The best-performing East Bay companies during the quarter were primarily in the high-tech and biotech industries:
 Novabay Pharmaceuticals jumped 188 percent. Emeryville-based Novabay said a deal it struck to develop and commercialize one of its dermatological compounds could produce $50 million in milestone payments for Novabay.
 Zhone Technologies soared 130 percent higher. Oakland-based Zhone lost money in its fourth quarter, but the loss was in line with expectations. The wireless communications also landed some key deals and moved forward with plans to serve the rural United States.
 Neurobiological Technologies was up 116 percent. The Emeryville-based biotech company said it would seek the sale of the company or its assets.
 Socket Mobile was up 79 percent. The Newark-based maker of mobile-computing devices reported record annual sales in 2008, although the company lost money during the year and the fourth quarter.
 SYNNEX Corp. jumped 74 percent. Fremont-based SYNNEX, a technology services company, announced fourth-quarter profits that beat analysts expectations by a wide margin.
Walnut Creek-based PMI Group was the worst-performing East Bay stock, falling 68 percent. The mortgage insurer reported a smaller fourth-quarter loss. PMI also was jolted by a downgrade by Fitch, which warned that PMI faces more losses and reduced liquidity.
Concord-based Pacer International fell 66 percent. The freight logistics company's fourth-quarter results fell short of estimates for earnings and revenues.
The best-performing Bay Area company was XTENT Inc., a Menlo Park medical devices company whose stock rocketed 367 percent higher. But the improvement may have been due to XTENT's disclosure during the quarter that it had hired an advisor to help it sell some core assets, sell the entire company, or seek a merger partner. XTENT also decided to eliminate 115 jobs, or 94 percent of its workforce.
Investors should be prepared to confront more volatility during the second quarter of this year, financial planners said.
And even after the volatility fades, and the economy starts to look better, it's still quite possible that a rebound won't produce much to cheer about.
"We're going into a slow-growth economy," Mihalka said. "Things will stay slow. And then we may have inflation.

Monday, March 23, 2009

Forget the Sideshow: Just Resuscitate the Credit Markets

For the second week in a row, equities managed to post a positive gain despite heavy profit-taking at the end of the week. The S&P 500 gained 1.6% to close at 769. From the early March lows the market is up 20%.

The big news is the Federal Reserve’s announcement to institute a program to buy $1 trillion worth of mortgage-backed and Treasury securities in an effort to boost economic growth. The market for mortgage-backed securities has been frozen for months. The Feds attempt to thaw this market has been well received. The move is designed to lower mortgage rates so many homeowners (that are not under water and have jobs) can refinance. This should increase homeowners' cash flow and reduce foreclosures. In addition, this may induce prospective buyers to begin purchasing homes, thus bolstering the battered housing market.

Unfortunately while the Fed is doing its best to prop up the markets, save the banks and jump start the economy, Washington is too busy with its own sideshows. This one comes complete with a freak show of politicians berating AIG bonus recipients. While the outrage engendered by these bonuses is understandable, the grandstanding and legislative response is not productive.

If this proposed tax on bonuses received by TARP recipients is enacted, it will surely hurt the Fed's efforts to prop up the banking system. The bonuses are egregious but it is more important to get the economy jump started than to pursue a witch hunt. Stabilizing the banks should be our first and last priority. If we cannot stabilize the banks the economy will get much worse and the credit markets will freeze up further. Stabilizing the banks and greasing the gears of the credit markets should remain the government’s focus, not sideshows and witch hunts. Punishing these bonus recipients isn’t necessary because in the end the markets will extract its own retribution in the form of reduced pay or no job at all. Sooner or later these kings of finance will find that their industry has changed and the pickings are slim to none.

I anticipate the markets will be a little choppy but the rally will continue at a slow pace. If you are not in the stock market, I highly recommend that you start dollar cost averaging back in.

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

Turnaround or Bounce? Look To The Banks

Last week’s positive move in the stock market was overdue, but it is unclear whether this is the beginning of a turnaround or merely a bounce from oversold conditions. There is some evidence that market conditions are improving. Last week’s rally was broad-based and volume was heavy, which are strong technical factors. Additionally, lower-quality stocks have been outperforming, which typically happens as markets turn around. However, it is very possible that we are still bottoming-out.

There was good economic news last week. Retail sales figures were surprisingly positive. January’s data was revised to show that sales actually rose, and February’s numbers were down only slightly. All told, it appears possible that overall first-quarter retail sales growth will net out to around zero, a much better scenario than was widely anticipated only a few weeks ago.

Today more good news. An unexpected rise in housing starts and a more moderate increase in wholesale prices point toward a brighter economic outlook. Another plus, the market appears to have leveled off before the recently passed stimulus package has started to have any effect.

That said, the overall economic environment remains troubled, and as Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said last week, “Until we stabilize the financial system, a sustainable economic recovery will remain out of reach. In particular, the continued viability of systemically important financial institutions is vital to this effort.” The banking system needs to stabilize before we see a full recovery.

Wednesday, May 9, 2007

It is Time to Rebalance

At the end of last week, the indices were all moving towards new highs. Despite slowing earnings growth the market just keeps heading up. While the long term trend is healthy, I think we are in for some turbulence. Usually when the market moves aggressively ahead, pushing toward new highs, after a while it takes very little news to derail the train. It seems inevitable as we head into the summer that the market will consolidate its gains by pulling back a little. The market will then take the summer off to digest the latest gains.

While the majority of the economic news remains positive there are negatives looming out there. For instance, there is slower U.S. employment growth, tightening credit, higher gas prices, slowing corporate earnings growth, and falling housing prices). Despite the negatives, the current situation does not warrant selling and walking away. Corporate earnings are still strong and P/E ratios are still reasonable (see chart). The current market conditions do warrant implementing a strategy of rebalancing and trimming. Increasing cash holdings over the next few weeks will enable an investor to take advantage of any pull backs. The catalyst(s) that could spark a correction is (are) unknown, but it could finally be the U.S. consumer cutting back or disappointing economic data.

It is likely that turbulence will be minor should it happen at all. The new global economy will continue to perform well pulling the U.S. market along with it. The story here is really the global economy and not just us anymore.
For right now, the market is still hot because of accelerating merger-and-acquisition activity. As of the end of last week the mid cap market has been blazing hot since the start of the year. In the last few weeks large cap domestic stocks have picked up the pace. It is very unclear whether large caps will finally outperform small and mid caps this year. It is inevitable that large caps will at some point outperform its small cap brethren in the future due to valuation metrics (see past blog postings for more information). International stocks are still chugging along with the MSCI EAFE up approximately 8% for the year. Bonds are showing some life with the Lehman Bros Aggregate index up almost 2% year-to-date.

Thursday, December 7, 2006

Investment Performance Commentary for November

Money and Investing - Performance Results November

Surprisingly, November was another good month for all the asset classes. The large-cap S&P 500 gained almost 2%, while smaller-cap stocks, as measured by the Russell 2000, gained 2.6%. Based on Russell indexes, value edged out growth in both the large- and small-cap areas. I was surprised by the strong performance this month of small caps. As I have explained in my previous newsletters (which can be found on my website http://www.altamontwealth.com the strong out performance of small cap stocks cannot be maintained indefinitely based on current valuation. Mid-caps were the anomaly this month: their 3.6% gain was significantly ahead of both large- and small-caps, and growth beat value by 70 basis points (that’s 0.7%). I frequently find that Mid Cap stocks don’t perform as expected because most of the investment world does not recognize them as a separate asset class.

The foreign stock Vanguard Total International benchmark was helped by a declining dollar, and posted a 3.7% gain in November. On the bond side, the Lehman Aggregate Bond Index was up 1.2%; high-yield corporates gained 1.6%, and developed markets foreign bonds climbed by 2.8%. Among our tactical asset class weightings, commodities gained 5.5% and emerging local markets bonds were up 2.2% (both positions are funded from an underweight to bonds). REITs gained another 4.7%, bringing their year-to-date tally to a dizzying 37.6%. I do not recommend owning REITs because they are over valued compared to the market value of the real estate they hold. They are still being valued primarily on the high current dividend rate.