Thursday, November 8, 2007

How Bad is the Housing Market? Pretty Bad

The pizza guy delivers a pizza to your door. He wants to be paid in cash right now. He doesn’t care how much equity you have built up in your house. You look in your wallet and it is empty. This scene is playing out for many home owners. They can’t make their mortgage payments and the bank is knocking on their door demanding payment. These resetting mortgages payments have ballooned to a level that borrowers aren’t able to pay.
Why did the banks and secondary lending institutions make these loans to people they knew would never be able to repay? Greed! Wall Street was clamoring for these riskier mortgages because they were looking for bonds that generated a higher yield (higher interest rates) and to heck with the risk. In particular, hedge funds had an insatiable appetite for these riskier asset-backed consumer loans. Here is the bad news: the worst is yet to come. The most egregious of these risky loans (with high escalating payments at reset) were 2 year Adjustable Rate Mortgages made in 2006 and early 2007. As the above graph shows there is a massive wave of these loans that will reset in 2008. The default rate will be significant. This is like watching a train wreck in slow motion.
Unfortunately, when excesses end, things don’t just return to normal. The pendulum frequently swings far in the other direction. This quick swing sparked a liquidity crisis on Wall Street. The mortgage defaults triggered an extreme lack of interest in holding consumer-backed debt, and an inclination on the part of most institutions not to lend to each other. This cascaded into broader risk avoidance on the part of investors, hedge funds, and other financial market players who have played an important role in expanding the amount of available credit. This was greatly exacerbated by large amounts of leverage (debt) held by many of the non-bank credit providers (e.g., hedge funds). The result was that credit, which as noted is crucial to the economy, was sharply restricted for a few weeks during the quarter.
With the Fed’s decisive action in September to cut the federal funds rate by 50 basis points, things have settled down, but they have not returned to normal. Capital will no longer be available to certain groups of borrowers and it will be costlier to other groups. This is somewhat good because excess liquidity was leading many investors to make imprudent investment decisions. On the flip side, the seizing up of the credit markets in a credit-dependent economy has a ripple effect which will hurt consumer spending.

With consumers unable to use their homes as an ATM machine (consumers extracting capital from their homes largely shut down and housing prices have fallen) and home sales severely slumping, the economy is faced with the possibility of a material cutback in consumer spending. The primary driver of economic growth is consumer spending, which accounts for approximately two thirds of the US economy. Some industries are already slumping since consumers have less cash available to spend on their homes and lifestyle. For instance, the furniture, home improvement and auto industries are already feeling the pain. The homebuilders and mortgage lending industries have also begun to retrench. All this has a negative multiplier effect on the economy. It seems highly probable that the economy will, at the very least, experience slower growth.

No comments: