Many economists believe that we are close to full employment (5% or less unemployment is considered full employment by economists and the Fed). These gurus fear that full employment could lead to rising wages which could then cause inflation. The Federal Reserve is focused on the core rate of inflation (inflation less the volatile food and energy segments). Inflation is currently at the high end of the Fed’s defined range of acceptable. So the Fed’s board members want the core inflation rate to fall but don’t want to raise interest rates again to achieve it. The Fed wants the market to adjust itself.
When Bernanke became Federal Reserve Chairman he stated that he wanted to communicate the Fed’s intentions more clearly to investors. The unintentional result has been the inversion of the yield curve (short term interest rates are higher than long term rates). In order to get long term interest rates up, the Fed has begun to abandon its policy of clear communication and transparency. It is instead refusing to send a clear message. The Fed recently changed its stance to neutral (instead of signaling its intention by stating a bias towards raising or lowering rates) but it is all posturing. The most recent Fed minutes from its last meeting are meandering and unclear. Consider, for instance, this excerpt from the minutes:
…the prevailing level of inflation remained uncomfortably high, and the latest information cast some doubt on whether core inflation was on the expected downward path. Most participants continued to expect that core inflation would slow gradually, but the recent readings on inflation and productivity growth, along with higher energy prices, had increased the odds that inflation would fail to moderate as expected; that risk remained the Committee’s predominant concern.
The Fed's mixed reactions regarding inflation are unsettling to many analysts and economists. It is all part of an elaborate game of chicken as the Fed desperately tries to balance the need to moderate inflation with keeping the economy growing. If the Fed has to raise short term rates to check inflation it might also destabilize the financial markets. If the Fed states a bias towards lowering short term rates, it could cause the markets to grow too quickly the old boom followed by bust pattern). The Fed hopes to avoid these scenarios by convincing the market to raise long term rates which should help moderate full employment and wages and hence cool the core inflation rate. It will be interesting to see who blinks first, the markets or the Fed.
The Financial Pragmatist
Libby Mihalka
No comments:
Post a Comment